Electronic invoice presentment and payment and Structural subordination: Difference between pages
From ACT Wiki
(Difference between pages)
imported>Doug Williamson (Added link to Treasurer's Handbook) |
imported>Doug Williamson (Clarify) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
''Risk management''. | |||
A reduction in the effective ranking of the claim of a lender or other creditor resulting from a combination of: | |||
#The ownership structure of the borrower, for example in a group of companies; and | |||
#Holding a claim against the 'wrong' legal entity. | |||
[[Category: | |||
For example, the claims of the creditors of a holding company may become structurally subordinated to the claims of creditors of the subsidiary companies in the same group. | |||
This is because the claim of the holding company itself - as a shareholder of the subsidiary - is generally subordinated to the claims of the other creditors of the subsidiary. | |||
This can be particularly problematic where the subsidiary is in a different country from the holding company, where local legal and other claims may effectively erode the position of the holding company's creditors. | |||
== See also == | |||
* [[Subordination]] | |||
[[Category:Financial_risk_management]] | |||
Revision as of 19:31, 6 April 2015
Risk management.
A reduction in the effective ranking of the claim of a lender or other creditor resulting from a combination of:
- The ownership structure of the borrower, for example in a group of companies; and
- Holding a claim against the 'wrong' legal entity.
For example, the claims of the creditors of a holding company may become structurally subordinated to the claims of creditors of the subsidiary companies in the same group.
This is because the claim of the holding company itself - as a shareholder of the subsidiary - is generally subordinated to the claims of the other creditors of the subsidiary.
This can be particularly problematic where the subsidiary is in a different country from the holding company, where local legal and other claims may effectively erode the position of the holding company's creditors.
