Redundancy: Difference between revisions
From ACT Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>Doug Williamson m (Reword.) |
imported>Doug Williamson (Add link.) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
1. ''Risk management''. | 1. ''Risk management''. | ||
Intentional overcapacity in | Intentional overcapacity in any system, to act as a backup in case of failures or unexpected future demand. | ||
2. | 2. ''Risk management.'' | ||
Intentional repetition in communications or data, so that if part of a message is lost or corrupted, the communication will still be understood. | Intentional repetition in communications or data, so that if part of a message is lost or corrupted, the communication will still be understood. | ||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
* [[Black swan]] | * [[Black swan]] | ||
* [[Employer]] | |||
* [[Guide to risk management]] | * [[Guide to risk management]] | ||
* [[Heuristic]] | * [[Heuristic]] | ||
| Line 26: | Line 27: | ||
* [[Optimisation]] | * [[Optimisation]] | ||
* [[Probability]] | * [[Probability]] | ||
* [[Resilience]] | |||
* [[Retrenchment]] | |||
* [[Risk]] | * [[Risk]] | ||
* [[Stress test]] | * [[Stress test]] | ||
Latest revision as of 15:18, 26 March 2023
1. Risk management.
Intentional overcapacity in any system, to act as a backup in case of failures or unexpected future demand.
2. Risk management.
Intentional repetition in communications or data, so that if part of a message is lost or corrupted, the communication will still be understood.
3.
Unnecessary or wasteful repetition or overcapacity.
4.
The ending of an employment at the instigation of the employer.
