Filleted financial statements and Net present value: Difference between pages

From ACT Wiki
(Difference between pages)
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>Doug Williamson
(Standardise page layout.)
 
imported>Doug Williamson
(Spacing and formatting.)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
Filleted financial statements are accounts which contain less information than full accounts.
(NPV).  


Most financial reporting systems allow smaller and medium-sized organisations to report limited financial information in this way for some purposes, in order to reduce the administrative burdens on them. For example, UK company law allows smaller entities to report less information for the public record at Companies House, compared with larger organisations.
'''1.'''


However, fuller-form and more detailed accounts are normally still required for other purposes. For example, for most tax purposes and for reporting to shareholders.
The total present value of all of the cash flows of a proposal - both positive and negative.  


For example, the expected future cash inflows from an investment project LESS the initial capital investment outflow at Time 0.


Also known as filleted accounts.


'''''Example'''''


==See also==
For example, a project requires an investment today of $100m, with $120m being receivable one year from now.
* [[Abridged accounts]]
 
* [[Companies House]]
 
The cost of capital (r) is 10% per annum.
 
The NPV of the project is calculated as follows:
 
 
PV of Time 0 outflow $100m
 
= $(100m)
 
PV of Time 1 inflow $120m = $120m x 1.1<sup>-1</sup>
 
= $109.09m
 
NPV = -$100m +$109.09m
 
= '''+$9.09m'''
 
 
'''2.'''
 
In simple ''Net Present Value analysis'' the decision rule would be that:
 
(1) All positive NPV opportunities should be accepted.
 
(2) All negative NPV opportunities should be rejected. 
 
 
So the project in the example above would be accepted - on this basis - because its NPV is positive, namely +$9.09m.
 
 
However this assumes the unlimited availability of further capital with no increase in the cost of capital.
 
A more refined decision rule is that all negative NPV opportunities should still be rejected while all positive NPV opportunities remain eligible for further consideration (rather than automatically being accepted).
 
 
== See also ==
* [[Capital rationing]]
* [[Discounted cash flow]]
* [[Internal rate of return]]
* [[Investment appraisal]]
* [[Present value]]
* [[Residual theory]]

Revision as of 16:20, 11 June 2013

(NPV).

1.

The total present value of all of the cash flows of a proposal - both positive and negative.

For example, the expected future cash inflows from an investment project LESS the initial capital investment outflow at Time 0.


Example

For example, a project requires an investment today of $100m, with $120m being receivable one year from now.


The cost of capital (r) is 10% per annum.

The NPV of the project is calculated as follows:


PV of Time 0 outflow $100m

= $(100m)

PV of Time 1 inflow $120m = $120m x 1.1-1

= $109.09m

NPV = -$100m +$109.09m

= +$9.09m


2.

In simple Net Present Value analysis the decision rule would be that:

(1) All positive NPV opportunities should be accepted.

(2) All negative NPV opportunities should be rejected.


So the project in the example above would be accepted - on this basis - because its NPV is positive, namely +$9.09m.


However this assumes the unlimited availability of further capital with no increase in the cost of capital.

A more refined decision rule is that all negative NPV opportunities should still be rejected while all positive NPV opportunities remain eligible for further consideration (rather than automatically being accepted).


See also