UTI: Difference between revisions

From ACT Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>Martin ODonovan
(add links - some yet to be created)
imported>Doug Williamson
(Add "Also known as a unique trade identifier". Source: The Treasurer, May 2014, p17.)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Unique Transaction Identifier.
Unique Transaction Identifier.


A UTI is a means of identifying a financial transaction and is required to be allocated to every derivative transaction that must be reported to a [[Trade Repository]] under [[EMIR]].  The regulators have not stipulated how it is to be created, instead it is being left to market participants to devise a suitable system or indeed a variety of approaches.   
A UTI is a means of identifying a financial transaction and is required to be allocated to every derivative transaction that must be reported to a [[Trade repository]] under [[EMIR]].  The regulators have not stipulated how it is to be created, instead it is being left to market participants to devise a suitable system or indeed a variety of approaches.   


If the UTI is created by one party to a trade and if it incorporates that party’s [[LEI]] (or part of it) as a prefix it can then add a transaction specific reference controlled so that it is unique within that firm.  The combination of LEI plus internal reference should be unique externally too. There then has to be a hierarchy to determine which party generates the UTI or whether some third party like a dealing platform or broker is better able to fulfil the role.  Whether or not a standardised system is adopted, ultimately it will be up to the parties to a deal to agree what UTI they use, and obviously both must use the same UTI.
If the UTI is created by one party to a trade and if it incorporates that party’s [[Legal entity identifier]] (LEI) (or part of it) as a prefix it can then add a transaction specific reference controlled so that it is unique within that firm.  The combination of LEI plus internal reference should be unique externally too. There then has to be a hierarchy to determine which party generates the UTI or whether some third party like a dealing platform or broker is better able to fulfil the role.  Whether or not a standardised system is adopted, ultimately it will be up to the parties to a deal to agree what UTI they use, and obviously both must use the same UTI.
 
 
Also known as a unique trade identifier.




Line 9: Line 12:
* [[EMIR]]
* [[EMIR]]


[[Category:Capital_Markets_and_Funding]]
[[Category:Corporate_financial_management]]
[[Category:Managing_Risk]]
[[Category:Risk_frameworks]]

Latest revision as of 11:30, 12 May 2014

Unique Transaction Identifier.

A UTI is a means of identifying a financial transaction and is required to be allocated to every derivative transaction that must be reported to a Trade repository under EMIR. The regulators have not stipulated how it is to be created, instead it is being left to market participants to devise a suitable system or indeed a variety of approaches.

If the UTI is created by one party to a trade and if it incorporates that party’s Legal entity identifier (LEI) (or part of it) as a prefix it can then add a transaction specific reference controlled so that it is unique within that firm. The combination of LEI plus internal reference should be unique externally too. There then has to be a hierarchy to determine which party generates the UTI or whether some third party like a dealing platform or broker is better able to fulfil the role. Whether or not a standardised system is adopted, ultimately it will be up to the parties to a deal to agree what UTI they use, and obviously both must use the same UTI.


Also known as a unique trade identifier.


See also