Weighted average cost of capital: Difference between revisions

From ACT Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>Doug Williamson
No edit summary
imported>Doug Williamson
(Standardise headings with examples)
Line 12: Line 12:
(2) Weighted by their current market values.
(2) Weighted by their current market values.


==WACC calculations==


For a firm with both equity and debt capital, the WACC would be calculated as:
For a firm with both equity and debt capital, the WACC would be calculated as:
Line 33: Line 35:




<span style="color:#4B0082">'''Example 1'''</span>
<span style="color:#4B0082">'''Example 1: Equal equity and debt'''</span>


Where:
Where:
Line 62: Line 64:




<span style="color:#4B0082">'''Example 2'''</span>
<span style="color:#4B0082">'''Example 2: Increasing equity, reducing debt'''</span>


Making a number of simplifying assumptions, if the proportion of equity were increased to 75% (= 0.75), the proportion of debt would fall to 25% and the WACC might theoretically increase to:
Making a number of simplifying assumptions, if the proportion of equity were increased to 75% (= 0.75), the proportion of debt would fall to 25% and the WACC might theoretically increase to:
Line 73: Line 75:




<span style="color:#4B0082">'''Example 3'''</span>
<span style="color:#4B0082">'''Example 3: Reducing equity, increasing debt'''</span>


If the firm was 'geared up' to reduce the proportion of equity to 25%, and increase the proportion of debt to 75%, again simplifying, the WACC might in theory fall to:
If the firm was 'geared up' to reduce the proportion of equity to 25%, and increase the proportion of debt to 75%, again simplifying, the WACC might in theory fall to:
Line 89: Line 91:




===Creating shareholder value===
==Creating shareholder value==


In order to create or add shareholder value, the managers of this firm would need to earn:
In order to create or add shareholder value, the managers of this firm would need to earn:
Line 115: Line 117:




===Other resources===
==Other resources==
*[http://www.treasurers.org/node/9023 Treasury essentials: Weighted average cost of capital, The Treasurer, May 2013]
*[http://www.treasurers.org/node/9023 Treasury essentials: Weighted average cost of capital, The Treasurer, May 2013]
*[[Media:2015_11_Nov_-_Balancing_act.pdf| Balancing act, The Treasurer, 2015]]
*[[Media:2015_11_Nov_-_Balancing_act.pdf| Balancing act, The Treasurer, 2015]]

Revision as of 14:47, 2 December 2015

(WACC).

Weighted average cost of capital is used as:

  • a discount rate in net present value analysis and
  • a hurdle rate in internal rate of return analysis.


The WACC is the average cost of capital of a firm, taking into account:

(1) All sources of capital

(2) Weighted by their current market values.


WACC calculations

For a firm with both equity and debt capital, the WACC would be calculated as:


WACC = Ke x proportion of equity + Kd(1-t) x proportion of debt

= Ke x E / ( D + E ) + Kd(1 - t) x D / ( D + E )


Where:

Ke = cost of equity.

Kd(1 -t) = after-tax cost of debt.

E = market value of equity.

D = market value of debt.


Example 1: Equal equity and debt

Where:

Ke = cost of equity = 10%

Kd(1-t) = after-tax cost of debt = 3.6%

E = market value of equity = $100m

D = market value of debt = $100m


WACC = Ke x E / ( D + E ) + Kd(1 - t) x D / ( D + E )

= 10 x 100 / ( 100 + 100 ) + 3.6 x 100 / ( 100 + 100 )

= 10 x 100 / 200 + 3.6 x 100 / 200

= 10 x 1/2 + 3.6 x 1/2

= 5 + 1.8

= 6.8%


This weighted average is exactly mid-way between the cost of equity (10%) and the after-tax cost of debt (3.6%), because the proportions of equity and debt are exactly equal in this first example.


Example 2: Increasing equity, reducing debt

Making a number of simplifying assumptions, if the proportion of equity were increased to 75% (= 0.75), the proportion of debt would fall to 25% and the WACC might theoretically increase to:

= 10 x 0.75 + 3.6 x 0.25

= 7.5 + 0.9

= 8.4%


Example 3: Reducing equity, increasing debt

If the firm was 'geared up' to reduce the proportion of equity to 25%, and increase the proportion of debt to 75%, again simplifying, the WACC might in theory fall to:

= 10 x 0.25 + 3.6 x 0.75

= 2.5 + 2.7

= 5.2%


However, the simplified second and third calculations above ignore the change in the risk to shareholders and to debt holders when the firm's capital structure is changed in this way.

In practice both the cost of equity and the cost of debt would normally change, following the change in capital structure, leading to a more complex analysis.


Creating shareholder value

In order to create or add shareholder value, the managers of this firm would need to earn:

(1) An after-tax rate of return on their investment projects

(2) Of more than the WACC - of, for example in Example 1 above, 6.8%.


See also


Other resources