Risk mitigant: Difference between revisions
From ACT Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>Doug Williamson (Create page. Sources: Linked pages.) |
imported>Doug Williamson (Add link.) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
''Risk management - risk mitigation.'' | ''Risk management - risk mitigation.'' | ||
A risk mitigant is a structure or an action that | A risk mitigant is a structure or an action that reduces the potential impact of a risk. | ||
Examples include collateral, guarantees, insurance and incorporating additional redundancy into operational processes. | Examples include collateral, guarantees, insurance and incorporating additional redundancy into operational processes. | ||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
* [[Guarantee]] | * [[Guarantee]] | ||
* [[Insurance]] | * [[Insurance]] | ||
* [[Mitigant]] | |||
* [[Redundancy]] | * [[Redundancy]] | ||
* [[Risk]] | |||
* [[Risk mitigation]] | * [[Risk mitigation]] | ||
* [[Risk response]] | |||
* [[Supply chain]] | * [[Supply chain]] | ||
Latest revision as of 18:33, 13 March 2023
Risk management - risk mitigation.
A risk mitigant is a structure or an action that reduces the potential impact of a risk.
Examples include collateral, guarantees, insurance and incorporating additional redundancy into operational processes.
- We need better risk mitigants
- "... we need to plan for the bad times as well as the good.
- This means more and better stress testing, more scenario planning, understanding the points of weakness in our supply chains and developing better risk mitigants.
- Certainly, construction costs have increased in recent months – the debate now is how much is transitory and how much is permanent.
- What is the trade-off of embedding more redundancy in our processes?"
- The Treasurer, November 2021 - Issue 4, 2021, p15 - Ian Chisholm, Group Treasurer, Grosvenor
