BBSW: Difference between revisions

From ACT Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>James_leather@hotmail.com
(replaced extensive details on BBSW calculation methodology evolution with a summary)
(Layout.)
 
(29 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Australia and BBSW'''
''Interest rates - reference rates - Australia.''
 
'''Authors: [https://www.linkedin.com/in/james-leather-treasury/ James Leather FCT CGMA]''', Corium Treasury Limited & '''[https://www.linkedin.com/in/pieterbierkens/ Pieter Bierkens]''', Ex Head of Interest Benchmark Reform, Commonwealth Bank of Australia.
 
 
'''BBSW : Definition, calculation and publication'''


Bank Bill Swap Reference Rate (from: B(ank) B(ill) SW(ap)).
Bank Bill Swap Reference Rate (from: B(ank) B(ill) SW(ap)).


BBSW is the interbank reference interest rate for Australia.
BBSW is a key interest rate benchmark for Australia.  The other being AONIA (also known as the “cash rate”).


It is Australia's equivalent of LIBOR or SIBOR, in that it is a reference rate that is referred to in many loan and derivative contracts, for which it will act as the base interest rate, before a margin is applied.
BBSW is a mid-rate.  It is calculated for the tenors of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 & 6 months from the live traded prices of the Eligible Securities of Prime Banks between 8.30am and 10am on a Sydney business day and is published daily at 10.30am Australian Eastern Time zone.


Given its wide usage, BBSW has been identified by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) as a financial benchmark of systemic importance to Australian financial markets and it is therefore important to anyone with an exposure to Australia, that there is ongoing confidence in it.  
See [[BBSW calculation methodology]] for mechanics and evolution (1).


As such, BBSW is an interest rate which includes a credit premium representing the market assessment of the premium payable by the Prime Banks relative to a comparable risk-free interest rate (RFR).  BBSW is used in many financial contracts (mainly lending and interest rate derivative products), for which it will act as the base interest rate, typically before a margin is applied (2).


'''BBSW calculation'''
The BBSW ‘bid’ and ‘ask’ rates are known as ‘BBSY’ and are +/- 5 basis points to BBSW.  BBSY is published on Refinitiv page ‘BBSY’ and on Bloomberg (1).


BBSW is a mid rate.
It is calculated and published daily (at 10.30am Australian Eastern Time zone) and is available for the tenors of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 & 6 months.
BBSY (Bank Bill Swap bid rate) is calculated from the BBSW rate, which derives the BID and ASK rates ( +/- 5 basis points)
Since 1 January 2017, the ASX has administrated and published the rates
Both rates are also available on Reuters under these acronyms.
Being the inter-bank rate, BBSW does contain bank credit risk.


The methodology used to calculate BBSW has evolved over the years - pre-2013 it involved asking a panel of banks to submit their assessment of where the market was trading in Prime Bank Paper at a particular time of the day.  Due to concerns with the integrity of the process (rigging), a new methodology (in line with IOSCO principles) was adopted in 2013 - this is known as NBBO (Nationally observed Best Bid and Offer rate) and involved taking live, executable inter-bank rates for 'Prime Bank eligible securities' sampled at three random intervals during a daily trading window at or around 10am at Approved Trading Venues (ATVs) and ignoring the highest and lowest rates ignored before taking an average to derive the BBSW rate for that tenor.  Between 2013 and 2015, trading of Prime Bank eligible securities during the BBSW sampling window fell to significantly low levels, which raised the risk that market participants might at some point be unwilling to use BBSW as a benchmark.  Thus in October 2015, the Council of Financial Regulators (CFR), initiated a consultation process that invited responses to a proposed evolution of the BBSW calculation methodology, to ensure it remained a trusted and relevant benchmark.  The new methodology that was accepted is known as VWAP (Volume Weighted Average Price) with NBBO to be used as a back up method.  VWAP broadens the underlying eligible securities to include those traded by non-banks, extends the rate set window, deploys interpolation and uses a mix of telephonic and electronic trading prices.  The transition to VWAP is / has been a significant exercise as it requires / has required the development of new market infrastructure and a change in the way that a significant part of the market operates.  Whilst AFMA own the methodology, the administration and publication of BBSW were passed to the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX), on 1 January 2017.  The ASX have continued to use the NBBO methodology but have gradually transitioned to the VWAP methodology in 2018, with go-live of the new BBSW VWAP methodology being 18th May 2018, as long as a parallel run that started on 26th March 2018 is successful.  In support of the new methodology, the ASX in consultation with regulators and market participants, has developed the BBSW Trade and Trade Reporting Guidelines. These are designed to provide clarity to participants on market practices to be followed when trading Bills and NCDs, to define trade reporting for the purpose of calculating a BBSW rate based on actual transactions and to meet regulatory requirements for Benchmark Administrators.
'''BBSW and Interest Rate Benchmark Reform'''


In response to the weaknesses identified in the setting of financial benchmarks such as the [former] London Interbank Offered Rate  (LIBOR), the global regulatory community has, since 2013, been involved in a programme  to strengthen financial benchmarks.  For Australia, the key interest rate benchmarks were identified as BBSW and AONIA (also known as the “cash rate”) for which reforms were undertaken to enhance their robustness (3).  Unlike [the former] LIBOR, the local market generates enough transactions to statistically support the BBSW benchmark.  This, along with the recent reforms, has meant that BBSW has remained sufficiently robust for Australian regulators to retain BBSW and to promote a “multiple-rate” approach, whereby market participants are expected to choose robust reference rates (e.g., BBSW or AONIA) that best suit each of their products and situations (4).


'''Glossary of BBSW terms'''


'''''Prime Banks''''' are those that meet eligibility criteria set by AFMA in early 2017, these were the four main banks of Australia:  NAB, Westpac, ANZ and CBA - but a greater range of banks have constituted the Prime Bank panel in the past.
'''BBSW Outlook'''


With the exception of 1-month  BBSW, as at September  2022, the view of the RBA (Reserve Bank of Australia) remains that BBSW is a robust benchmark (4) and expected to have a secure future, since the assets of managed funds, which are among the main investors of bank bills, continue to grow, supported by superannuation (pension) contributions (5). 


'''''Eligible Securities''''' are '''''Negotiable Certificates of Deposit''''' (NCDs) and '''''Bank Accepted Bills''''' (BABs) of Prime Banks.
However, the RBA has commented that BBSW’s status as a robust benchmark should not be taken for granted (5).  It has  pointed out that, although growing, the bank bill market from which BBSW rates are derived (see BBSW calculation methodology), is declining both as a share of managed funds’ assets and major banks’ liabilities. This is partly due to the liquidity standards introduced over recent years (e.g. Basel 3), which reduced the value that banks place on short-term wholesale funding (5).  This has especially been evident in the 1-month BBSW tenor, with potential users of the rate being advised to give careful consideration to using alternative benchmarks, such as 3-month  BBSW or AONIA (the Australian cash rate) (5).  


In early 2017, NCDs formed about 85% of eligible securities, with BABs forming the balance.
In addition, regardless of the robustness of BBSW, there is expected to be a natural migration away from using BBSW in some products, where it might have been used historically, towards AONIA.  This applies in particular, to financial products that contain reference to a risk-free rate in another currency.  Such products may include: cross-currency swaps (where certain IBORs have been replaced by the respective RFRs); and multi-currency lending facilities and other financial contracts (to align RFR usage across currencies) (6).  


They are seen as a homogenous asset class that promotes market liquidity and provides the basis for effective price discovery in the market. 


NCDs and BABs form a key part of the range of instruments through which banks manage their liquidity.
'''Fallback Provisions'''


A key element of Australia’s multiple-rate approach are fallbacks, which provide valuable insurance when using any benchmark (3).  With respect to BBSW, the RBA have adopted a ‘principles-based’ approach, requesting that market participants include a ‘robust, reasonable and fair’ fallback to another interest rate in their financial contracts (7). 


'''''Approved Trading Venues''''' - where the trade in eligible securities occurs - ICAP, Tullett Prebon and Yieldbroker,  as at early 2017.
The RBA have said that the BBSW derivative fallbacks (primarily AONIA compounded in arrears plus an adjustment for the historical spread to BBSW) set out in ISDA’s IBOR Fallbacks Supplement and Protocol are just one example of a fallback that meets their ‘robust, reasonable and fair’ criteria.  However, they see it as practical and more efficient for market participants to work together to develop market conventions that specify the specific fallback rates and language to be used in prospectuses and other legal documents.  The Australian Financial Markets Association (AFMA) and the Australian Securitisation Forum (ASF) are cited as examples of industry groups who are developing their own template fallback language for use in BBSW-linked securities (AFMA 2021; ASF 2021) (7).
 
To promote appropriate use of fallbacks, the RBA will only accept securities referencing BBSW issued after 1 December 2022 as collateral in its domestic market operations if those securities include a fallback that meets its criteria (7).
 
 
''(LIBOR ended in September 2024.)''




==See also==
==See also==
* [[AONIA]]
* [[ANZ]]
* [[ANZ]]
* [[Ask]]
* [[ASX]]
* [[ASX]]
* [[Australia]]
* [[Australia]]
* [[Australian Financial Markets Association]]
* [[Australian Financial Regulation]]
* [[Australian Financial Regulation]]
* [[Australian Securitisation Forum]]  (ASF)
* [[Basel III]]
* [[Basis point]]
* [[Benchmark]]
* [[Bid]]
* [[Bill]]
* [[BBSW calculation methodology]]
* [[Collateral]]
* [[Eligible security]]
* [[Fallback]]
* [[IBOR]]
* [[IBOR Transformation Australian Working Group]]
* [[Insurance]]
* [[Interest rate]]
* [[International Organization of Securities Commissions]]
* [[International Organization of Securities Commissions]]
* [[LIBOR]]
* [[International Swaps and Derivatives Association]]  (ISDA)
* [[Liquid]]
* [[Mid rate]]
* [[Migration]]
* [[Premium]]
* [[Prime bank]]
* [[Prime bank]]
* [[Reference rate]]
* [[Reference rate]]
* [[SIBOR]]
* [[Reserve Bank of Australia]]  (RBA)
* [[Risk-free rates]]  (RFR)
* [[Swap]]
* [[Tenor]]
 
 
==References==
 
(1) [https://www2.asx.com.au/content/asx/search.html?q=bbsy ASX Bank BBSW Conventions and BBSW Methodology -  Effective 10th February 2020]
 
 
(2) [https://www2.asx.com.au/connectivity-and-data/information-services/benchmarks/benchmark-data/bbsw ASX Benchmark Rates]
 
 
(3)  [https://www.rba.gov.au/mkt-operations/resources/interest-rate-benchmark-reform.html Interest Rate Benchmark Reform in Australia - RBA]




==Notes==
(4)  [https://www.bis.org/review/r210318b.pdf “The End of Libor and the Australian Market”, ISDA Benchmark Strategies Forum Asia Pacific, Online, March 2021 - speech by Christopher Kent, Assistant Governor (Financial Markets) RBA]


'''ASIC sues NAB, ANZ and Westpac'''


[http://asic.gov.au/about-asic/media-centre/find-a-media-release/2016-releases/16-183mr-asic-commences-civil-penalty-proceedings-against-national-australia-bank-for-bbsw-conduct/ ASIC press release - 7 June 2016]
(5)  [https://www.rba.gov.au/speeches/2019/sp-ag-2019-03-19.html Debt Capital Markets Summit, Sydney, 19 March 2019 - speech by Christopher Kent, Assistant Governor (Financial Markets) RBA]


[http://asic.gov.au/about-asic/media-centre/find-a-media-release/2016-releases/16-110mr-asic-commences-civil-penalty-proceedings-against-westpac-for-bbsw-conduct/ ASIC press release - 5 April 2016]


[http://asic.gov.au/about-asic/media-centre/find-a-media-release/2016-releases/16-060mr-asic-commences-civil-penalty-proceedings-against-anz-for-bbsw-conduct/ ASIC press release - 4 March 2016]
(6)  [https://afma.com.au/getattachment/Policy/topics/Benchmarks-Ibor-Transition/Sections/Content/20220404-ITAWG-Market-Statement-Publication.pdf?lang=en-AU Use of interest rate benchmarks in Australia - IBOR Transformation Australian Working Group - 4 April 2022]




(7)  [https://www.rba.gov.au/publications/bulletin/2022/jun/fallbacks-for-bbsw-securities.html Fallbacks for BBSW - RBA - 16 June 2022]


'''US class action'''


[https://www.msn.com/en-au/money/topstories/rate-rigging-anz-nab-confirm-us-class-action-over-alleged-bbsw-manipulation/ar-BBvKWSK  News report - 18 August 2016]
(8)  [https://www.coriumtreasury.com/ Corium Treasury]


[[Category:Technical_skills]]
[[Category:Accounting,_tax_and_regulation]]
[[Category:The_business_context]]

Latest revision as of 07:52, 5 October 2024

Interest rates - reference rates - Australia.

Authors: James Leather FCT CGMA, Corium Treasury Limited & Pieter Bierkens, Ex Head of Interest Benchmark Reform, Commonwealth Bank of Australia.


BBSW : Definition, calculation and publication

Bank Bill Swap Reference Rate (from: B(ank) B(ill) SW(ap)).

BBSW is a key interest rate benchmark for Australia. The other being AONIA (also known as the “cash rate”).

BBSW is a mid-rate. It is calculated for the tenors of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 & 6 months from the live traded prices of the Eligible Securities of Prime Banks between 8.30am and 10am on a Sydney business day and is published daily at 10.30am Australian Eastern Time zone.

See BBSW calculation methodology for mechanics and evolution (1).

As such, BBSW is an interest rate which includes a credit premium representing the market assessment of the premium payable by the Prime Banks relative to a comparable risk-free interest rate (RFR). BBSW is used in many financial contracts (mainly lending and interest rate derivative products), for which it will act as the base interest rate, typically before a margin is applied (2).

The BBSW ‘bid’ and ‘ask’ rates are known as ‘BBSY’ and are +/- 5 basis points to BBSW. BBSY is published on Refinitiv page ‘BBSY’ and on Bloomberg (1).


BBSW and Interest Rate Benchmark Reform

In response to the weaknesses identified in the setting of financial benchmarks such as the [former] London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), the global regulatory community has, since 2013, been involved in a programme to strengthen financial benchmarks. For Australia, the key interest rate benchmarks were identified as BBSW and AONIA (also known as the “cash rate”) for which reforms were undertaken to enhance their robustness (3). Unlike [the former] LIBOR, the local market generates enough transactions to statistically support the BBSW benchmark. This, along with the recent reforms, has meant that BBSW has remained sufficiently robust for Australian regulators to retain BBSW and to promote a “multiple-rate” approach, whereby market participants are expected to choose robust reference rates (e.g., BBSW or AONIA) that best suit each of their products and situations (4).


BBSW Outlook

With the exception of 1-month BBSW, as at September 2022, the view of the RBA (Reserve Bank of Australia) remains that BBSW is a robust benchmark (4) and expected to have a secure future, since the assets of managed funds, which are among the main investors of bank bills, continue to grow, supported by superannuation (pension) contributions (5).

However, the RBA has commented that BBSW’s status as a robust benchmark should not be taken for granted (5). It has pointed out that, although growing, the bank bill market from which BBSW rates are derived (see BBSW calculation methodology), is declining both as a share of managed funds’ assets and major banks’ liabilities. This is partly due to the liquidity standards introduced over recent years (e.g. Basel 3), which reduced the value that banks place on short-term wholesale funding (5). This has especially been evident in the 1-month BBSW tenor, with potential users of the rate being advised to give careful consideration to using alternative benchmarks, such as 3-month BBSW or AONIA (the Australian cash rate) (5).

In addition, regardless of the robustness of BBSW, there is expected to be a natural migration away from using BBSW in some products, where it might have been used historically, towards AONIA. This applies in particular, to financial products that contain reference to a risk-free rate in another currency. Such products may include: cross-currency swaps (where certain IBORs have been replaced by the respective RFRs); and multi-currency lending facilities and other financial contracts (to align RFR usage across currencies) (6).


Fallback Provisions

A key element of Australia’s multiple-rate approach are fallbacks, which provide valuable insurance when using any benchmark (3). With respect to BBSW, the RBA have adopted a ‘principles-based’ approach, requesting that market participants include a ‘robust, reasonable and fair’ fallback to another interest rate in their financial contracts (7).

The RBA have said that the BBSW derivative fallbacks (primarily AONIA compounded in arrears plus an adjustment for the historical spread to BBSW) set out in ISDA’s IBOR Fallbacks Supplement and Protocol are just one example of a fallback that meets their ‘robust, reasonable and fair’ criteria. However, they see it as practical and more efficient for market participants to work together to develop market conventions that specify the specific fallback rates and language to be used in prospectuses and other legal documents. The Australian Financial Markets Association (AFMA) and the Australian Securitisation Forum (ASF) are cited as examples of industry groups who are developing their own template fallback language for use in BBSW-linked securities (AFMA 2021; ASF 2021) (7).

To promote appropriate use of fallbacks, the RBA will only accept securities referencing BBSW issued after 1 December 2022 as collateral in its domestic market operations if those securities include a fallback that meets its criteria (7).


(LIBOR ended in September 2024.)


See also


References

(1) ASX Bank BBSW Conventions and BBSW Methodology - Effective 10th February 2020


(2) ASX Benchmark Rates


(3) Interest Rate Benchmark Reform in Australia - RBA


(4) “The End of Libor and the Australian Market”, ISDA Benchmark Strategies Forum Asia Pacific, Online, March 2021 - speech by Christopher Kent, Assistant Governor (Financial Markets) RBA


(5) Debt Capital Markets Summit, Sydney, 19 March 2019 - speech by Christopher Kent, Assistant Governor (Financial Markets) RBA


(6) Use of interest rate benchmarks in Australia - IBOR Transformation Australian Working Group - 4 April 2022


(7) Fallbacks for BBSW - RBA - 16 June 2022


(8) Corium Treasury