Stability: Difference between revisions
From ACT Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>Doug Williamson m (Spacing 20/8/13) |
(Add link.) |
||
| (11 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
2. | 2. ''Pensions funding.'' | ||
A pensions funding method is considered stable if it is not greatly affected by fluctuations in experience. | |||
3. ''Bank funding.'' | |||
Sources of bank funding are considered stable if they can be depended on to remain as part of the bank's funding, including under conditions of stress. | |||
For example, deposits by retail customers within the size limits of relevant deposit guarantee schemes are considered relatively more stable, compared with larger and professionally managed deposits. | |||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
* [[Deposit]] | |||
* [[Deposit Guarantee Scheme]] | |||
* [[Experience]] | * [[Experience]] | ||
* [[Flighty]] | |||
* [[Funding]] | |||
* [[High Council for Financial Stability]] | |||
* [[Leverage]] | |||
* [[Maturity transformation]] | |||
* [[Operational balances]] | |||
* [[Retail]] | |||
* [[Run]] | |||
* [[Run rate]] | |||
* [[Sticky]] | |||
* [[Stress]] | |||
* [[Term out]] | |||
* [[Volatile]] | |||
* [[Volatility]] | |||
[[Category:Accounting,_tax_and_regulation]] | |||
[[Category:The_business_context]] | |||
Latest revision as of 03:55, 5 November 2024
1.
The desirable qualities of predictability and confidence about future market conditions.
2. Pensions funding.
A pensions funding method is considered stable if it is not greatly affected by fluctuations in experience.
3. Bank funding.
Sources of bank funding are considered stable if they can be depended on to remain as part of the bank's funding, including under conditions of stress.
For example, deposits by retail customers within the size limits of relevant deposit guarantee schemes are considered relatively more stable, compared with larger and professionally managed deposits.
