Stability: Difference between revisions
From ACT Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>Doug Williamson m (Link with High Council for Financial Stability page.) |
imported>Doug Williamson (Classify page.) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
2. | 2. ''Pensions funding.'' | ||
''Pensions funding.'' | |||
A pensions funding method is considered stable if it is not greatly affected by fluctuations in experience. | A pensions funding method is considered stable if it is not greatly affected by fluctuations in experience. | ||
3. | 3. ''Bank funding.'' | ||
''Bank funding.'' | |||
Sources of bank funding are considered stable if they can be depended on to remain as part of the bank's funding, including under conditions of stress. | Sources of bank funding are considered stable if they can be depended on to remain as part of the bank's funding, including under conditions of stress. | ||
| Line 37: | Line 33: | ||
* [[Term out]] | * [[Term out]] | ||
* [[Volatility]] | * [[Volatility]] | ||
[[Category:Accounting,_tax_and_regulation]] | |||
[[Category:The_business_context]] | |||
Revision as of 11:34, 2 July 2022
1.
The desirable qualities of predictability and confidence about future market conditions.
2. Pensions funding.
A pensions funding method is considered stable if it is not greatly affected by fluctuations in experience.
3. Bank funding.
Sources of bank funding are considered stable if they can be depended on to remain as part of the bank's funding, including under conditions of stress.
For example, deposits by retail customers within the size limits of relevant deposit guarantee schemes are considered relatively more stable, compared with larger and professionally managed deposits.
