Waterfall: Difference between revisions

From ACT Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>Doug Williamson
m (Add link.)
imported>Doug Williamson
(Add priority ordering in liquidation.)
Line 2: Line 2:


The priority order of claims in a liquidation.
The priority order of claims in a liquidation.
Broadly speaking, this priority order is:
#Secured creditors
#Preferential creditors
#Fixed charge creditors
#Floating charge creditors
#Unsecured creditors
#Connected unsecured creditors
#Shareholders
Breaching this ordering is a ''preference'', that can be effectively reversed by an order of the court.




Line 43: Line 56:
== See also ==
== See also ==
* [[Agile]]
* [[Agile]]
* [[Connected company]]
* [[Connected person]]
* [[Court]]
* [[Creditors]]
* [[Equity]]
* [[Equity]]
* [[Fallback]]
* [[Fallback]]
* [[Fixed charge]]
* [[Floating charge]]
* [[Funding stack]]
* [[Funding stack]]
* [[Junior debt]]
* [[Junior debt]]
* [[LIBOR]]
* [[LIBOR]]
* [[Liquidation]]
* [[Liquidation]]
* [[Preference]]
* [[Preferential creditor]]
* [[Preferential creditor]]
* [[Risk-free rates]]
* [[Risk-free rates]]
* [[Secured creditor]]
* [[Security]]
* [[Senior debt]]
* [[Senior debt]]
* [[Seniority]]
* [[Seniority]]
* [[Subordinated debt]]
* [[Subordinated debt]]
* [[Unsecured debt]]
* [[Valuation]]
* [[Valuation]]
* [[Waterfall methodology]]
* [[Waterfall methodology]]

Revision as of 02:11, 29 May 2021

1. Liquidation - claims.

The priority order of claims in a liquidation.

Broadly speaking, this priority order is:

  1. Secured creditors
  2. Preferential creditors
  3. Fixed charge creditors
  4. Floating charge creditors
  5. Unsecured creditors
  6. Connected unsecured creditors
  7. Shareholders


Breaching this ordering is a preference, that can be effectively reversed by an order of the court.


2. Liquidation.

The allocation of - usually limited - available funds in this priority order in a liquidation.


3. Allocating limited funds.

Any other ranked allocation of funds.


4. Risk-free rates - valuation.

Abbreviation for waterfall methodology.


Uniform determination methodology
From mid-2018 a new, uniform determination methodology, the “waterfall methodology”, by which each contributing bank calculates the rates it submits, was progressively introduced. The underlying interest - the market or economic reality that the benchmark seeks to measure - remains the same.
The “waterfall” methodology refers to the three bases for a bank’s rate submission... the first practical method being used in any case according to the information available...
The three bases in the LIBOR waterfall are:
Level 1: Transaction-based
Level 2: Transaction-derived
Level 3: Expert judgement


In summary, the new methodology is more rooted in actual transactions as far as possible. Using less “judgement” that can involve a (possibly unconscious) element of “smoothing”, contributed rates are expected to vary up and down more by small amounts each day. And, recognising the reality that banks short-term-fund in the wider money-markets now, rather just inter-bank, the range of transactions considered is being widened and this can mean small rate differences.
Following the successful completion of the transition period, LIBOR is now, for each currency/maturity combination, the rate output as the arithmetic mean of the relevant panel banks’ waterfall-methodology based submissions, excluding the highest and lowest quartile of submissions.
The Treasurer's Wiki - LIBOR.


See also