De jure: Difference between revisions

From ACT Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>Doug Williamson
(Create page. Sources: Linked pages.)
 
imported>Doug Williamson
(Mend link.)
 
Line 19: Line 19:
== See also ==
== See also ==
* [[Asian capital market integration: theory and evidence]]
* [[Asian capital market integration: theory and evidence]]
* [[Capital controls]]
* [[Capital control]]
* [[De facto ]]
* [[De facto ]]


[[Category:Accounting,_tax_and_regulation]]
[[Category:Accounting,_tax_and_regulation]]
[[Category:The_business_context]]
[[Category:The_business_context]]

Latest revision as of 23:39, 26 June 2021

Law - company law - regulation.

Existing as a legal right or restriction, whether or not borne out as a matter of practical reality.

The opposite of de facto.


De facto capital market integration exceeds de jure
"[There is a] substantial gap between de facto and de jure measures of financial openness and integration.
In short, the fact that numerous developing countries impose significant legal controls on the international movement of capital does not mean that such controls are particularly effective in curbing international capital flows.
Actual financial integration – as measured by capital flows and cross-border financial asset holdings – may significantly exceed the level implied by corresponding legal controls."
Asian capital market integration - the Treasurer's Wiki


See also