Hybrid mismatch arrangement: Difference between revisions
From ACT Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>Doug Williamson (Add link.) |
imported>Doug Williamson (Update links.) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
* [[Base erosion and profit shifting]] | * [[Base erosion and profit shifting]] | ||
* [[Business in Europe: Framework for Income Taxation]] | |||
* [[CbC reporting]] | * [[CbC reporting]] | ||
* [[Corporation Tax]] | * [[Corporation Tax]] | ||
* [[Diverted profits tax]] | * [[Diverted profits tax]] | ||
Revision as of 16:09, 21 February 2022
Tax.
A hybrid mismatch arrangement is an arrangement:
- Intended to secure a tax advantage within a multinational group
- Resulting from a difference in tax treatment of the same financial instrument or entity between different jurisdictions.
Hybrid mismatch arrangements can arise both from hybrid financial instruments and from hybrid entities.
Following OECD and G20 initiatives in relation to tax base erosion and profit shifting, the UK introduced anti-hybrid tax rules, effective from 2017.
See also
- Base erosion and profit shifting
- Business in Europe: Framework for Income Taxation
- CbC reporting
- Corporation Tax
- Diverted profits tax
- Double taxation
- Fixed ratio method
- G20
- Hybrid
- Hybrid capital
- Hybrid entity
- Multinational corporation/company
- OECD
- Tax avoidance
- Transfer pricing
- Worldwide interest cap
