OECD model tax convention: Difference between revisions
imported>Doug Williamson (Create the page. Source ACT CertFin CT 3.1.1 pages 10 to 11.) |
imported>Doug Williamson (Classify page.) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
* [[Convention]] | |||
* [[Double tax treaties]] | * [[Double tax treaties]] | ||
* [[Double taxation]] | * [[Double taxation]] | ||
| Line 22: | Line 23: | ||
* [[Profit shifting]] | * [[Profit shifting]] | ||
* [[Residence]] | * [[Residence]] | ||
[[Category:Accounting,_tax_and_regulation]] | |||
[[Category:The_business_context]] | |||
[[Category:Compliance_and_audit]] | |||
[[Category:Ethics]] | |||
[[Category:Identify_and_assess_risks]] | |||
[[Category:Manage_risks]] | |||
[[Category:Risk_frameworks]] | |||
[[Category:Risk_reporting]] | |||
Revision as of 11:58, 16 December 2021
Tax.
Companies often operate in a number of different countries and, as a result, may be resident in more than one country under the different domestic tax laws of each country.
Many developed countries have entered into bilateral international tax agreements, known as double tax treaties, with other countries. Many, but not all, of the tax treaties follow the OECD model tax convention.
The OECD model convention provides a basis that can be used to draw up a bilateral tax agreement between two states, that seeks to eliminate double taxation. Double tax treaties also help to encourage cross border trade.
The OECD model tax convention contains a 'tie breaker' clause that determines a company’s tax residence for the purposes of the treaty.
This is taken to be the place where ‘effective management’ and control (POEM) is carried on. In a tie context this test requires a review of where the day to day management of the company takes place.
