P2P: Difference between revisions
From ACT Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>Doug Williamson (Link with Due diligence card.) |
imported>Doug Williamson (Layout.) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
1. | |||
Purchase-to-Pay | |||
2. | |||
Peer-to-peer | |||
Line 15: | Line 21: | ||
Some commentators predict there will be substantial losses on peer-to-peer lending, following inadequate due diligence. | Some commentators predict there will be substantial losses on peer-to-peer lending, following inadequate due diligence. | ||
== See also == | == See also == |
Revision as of 15:34, 13 May 2016
1.
Purchase-to-Pay
2.
Peer-to-peer
Purchase-to-Pay cycle
The purchase-to-pay cycle is about the trade finance cycle between an organisation and its suppliers.
The primary concerns of the purchasing organisation are normally with:
- Mitigating delivery risk
- Extending the payment cycle as far as commercially reasonable.
Peer-to-peer lending
Direct lending and borrowing between non-financial businesses, contrasted with traditional bank-based lending.
Some commentators predict there will be substantial losses on peer-to-peer lending, following inadequate due diligence.