Letter of credit: Difference between revisions

From ACT Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>Maw@allmanward.com
(Link to Bank payment obligation)
imported>Doug Williamson
(Remove surplus links.)
 
(14 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
(LC).  
(LC or sometimes LOC).  


A promise document issued by a bank or another issuer to a third party to make a payment on behalf of a customer in accordance with specified conditions.  
A promise document issued by a bank or another issuer to a third party to make a payment on behalf of a customer in accordance with specified conditions.  


Letters of credit are frequently used in international trade to make funds available in a foreign location.
Letters of credit are frequently used in international trade to make funds available in a foreign location.
==== Letter of credit contrasted with documentary collection ====
Letters of credit are often contrasted, from the perspective of a seller, with an alternative structure of [[documentary collection]]s.
A letter of credit is a ''direct'' obligation of a bank to pay (against specified documents).
A documentary collection means a bank ''collecting'' payment from the buyer (by presenting documents to the buyer).
A letter of credit therefore gives superior protection to the seller against credit risk or delayed cash flow, or both.
For this reason letters of credit are more expensive to arrange.
Compared with documentary collections (DCs), letters of credit (LCs) are used for larger transactions, and a larger total value of transactions.
LC and DC indicative data is summarised below.
=====Average transaction sizes (US exports)=====
LCs: US$ 0.5 - 1 million
DCs: US$ 0.1 - 0.2 million
=====Proportion of world trade in goods=====
LCs: 10 - 15%
DCs: 1 - 2%




Line 15: Line 44:
* [[Confirming bank]]
* [[Confirming bank]]
* [[Credit]]
* [[Credit]]
* [[Documentary collection]]
* [[Documentary credit]]
* [[Documentary credit]]
* [[Irrevocable letter of credit]]
* [[Irrevocable letter of credit]]
* [[Issuing bank]]
* [[Issuing bank]]
* [[LOC backed]]
* [[LOC backed]]
* [[Revocable letter of credit]]
* [[Standby letter of credit]]
* [[Standby letter of credit]]
* [[Term letter of credit]]
* [[Trade finance]]
* [[Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits]]
* [[Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits]]




==Other links==
==External link==
[http://www.treasurers.org/node/5279 Letters of credit and supply chain finance, Will Spinney, ACT 2009]
[http://voxeu.org/article/trade-finance-around-world Trade finance around the world, Centre for Economic and Policy Research, 2016]
 
 
__NOTOC__


[[Category:Trade_Finance]]
[[Category:Manage_risks]]
[[Category:Risk_frameworks]]
[[Category:Trade_finance]]

Latest revision as of 11:54, 6 July 2022

(LC or sometimes LOC).

A promise document issued by a bank or another issuer to a third party to make a payment on behalf of a customer in accordance with specified conditions.

Letters of credit are frequently used in international trade to make funds available in a foreign location.


Letter of credit contrasted with documentary collection

Letters of credit are often contrasted, from the perspective of a seller, with an alternative structure of documentary collections.

A letter of credit is a direct obligation of a bank to pay (against specified documents).

A documentary collection means a bank collecting payment from the buyer (by presenting documents to the buyer).


A letter of credit therefore gives superior protection to the seller against credit risk or delayed cash flow, or both.

For this reason letters of credit are more expensive to arrange.


Compared with documentary collections (DCs), letters of credit (LCs) are used for larger transactions, and a larger total value of transactions.

LC and DC indicative data is summarised below.

Average transaction sizes (US exports)

LCs: US$ 0.5 - 1 million

DCs: US$ 0.1 - 0.2 million

Proportion of world trade in goods

LCs: 10 - 15%

DCs: 1 - 2%


See also


External link

Trade finance around the world, Centre for Economic and Policy Research, 2016