Multiple Point of Entry: Difference between revisions

From ACT Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>Doug Williamson
(Expand to note 'bottom up' resolution expressly. Source: The Treasurer, November 2015, p49.)
imported>Doug Williamson
(Classify page.)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<i>Bank resolution.</i>
(MPE).
(MPE).
<i>Bank resolution.</i>


Multiple Point of Entry resolution of a failed or failing bank group splits it up into its parts.  
Multiple Point of Entry resolution of a failed or failing bank group splits it up into its parts.  
Line 9: Line 9:


Distressed parts would need to be resolved variously via:
Distressed parts would need to be resolved variously via:
 
#Purchase and Assumption or
(1) Purchase and Assumption,
#Liquidation and Payout or
 
#Bailin of units/subsidiaries.
(2) Liquidation and Payout or
 
(3) Bailin of units/subsidiaries.




Line 21: Line 18:


== See also ==
== See also ==
* [[Resolution]]
* [[Single Point of Entry]]
* [[Bailin]]
* [[Bailin]]
* [[Liquidation and Payout]]
* [[Liquidation and Payout]]
* [[Purchase and Assumption]]
* [[Purchase and Assumption]]
* [[Resolution]]
* [[Single Point of Entry]]
[[Category:Accounting,_tax_and_regulation]]
[[Category:The_business_context]]

Latest revision as of 20:15, 1 July 2022

Bank resolution.

(MPE).

Multiple Point of Entry resolution of a failed or failing bank group splits it up into its parts.

Healthy parts might be sold, or be maintained as a residual group.


Distressed parts would need to be resolved variously via:

  1. Purchase and Assumption or
  2. Liquidation and Payout or
  3. Bailin of units/subsidiaries.


Sometimes known as 'bottom-up' resolution.


See also