Multiple Point of Entry: Difference between revisions
From ACT Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>Doug Williamson (Layout.) |
imported>Doug Williamson (Layout.) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Distressed parts would need to be resolved variously via: | Distressed parts would need to be resolved variously via: | ||
#Purchase and Assumption | #Purchase and Assumption or | ||
#Liquidation and Payout or | #Liquidation and Payout or | ||
#Bailin of units/subsidiaries. | #Bailin of units/subsidiaries. | ||
Revision as of 14:11, 11 May 2016
(MPE).
Bank resolution.
Multiple Point of Entry resolution of a failed or failing bank group splits it up into its parts.
Healthy parts might be sold, or be maintained as a residual group.
Distressed parts would need to be resolved variously via:
- Purchase and Assumption or
- Liquidation and Payout or
- Bailin of units/subsidiaries.
Sometimes known as 'bottom-up' resolution.
