Multiple Point of Entry: Difference between revisions
From ACT Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>Doug Williamson (Expand to note 'bottom up' resolution expressly. Source: The Treasurer, November 2015, p49.) |
imported>Doug Williamson (Layout.) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Distressed parts would need to be resolved variously via: | Distressed parts would need to be resolved variously via: | ||
#Purchase and Assumption, | |||
#Liquidation and Payout or | |||
#Bailin of units/subsidiaries. | |||
Revision as of 13:55, 11 May 2016
(MPE).
Bank resolution.
Multiple Point of Entry resolution of a failed or failing bank group splits it up into its parts.
Healthy parts might be sold, or be maintained as a residual group.
Distressed parts would need to be resolved variously via:
- Purchase and Assumption,
- Liquidation and Payout or
- Bailin of units/subsidiaries.
Sometimes known as 'bottom-up' resolution.
