Squeeze and Stability: Difference between pages

From ACT Wiki
(Difference between pages)
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>Doug Williamson
(Create page. Source: The Treasurer, September 2017, p37.)
 
imported>Doug Williamson
m (Link with High Council for Financial Stability page.)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
''Conduct risk - financial markets''
1.


A squeeze is a less extreme case of a market corner.
The desirable qualities of predictability and confidence about future market conditions.




:"A market corner arises where a party attempts to achieve a dominant controlling market position to dictate price.
2.


:A squeeze arises where a party does not seek dominance, but attempts to gain control of sufficient amounts of a commodity or security to impact prices."
''Pensions funding.''


:''The Treasurer magazine, September/October 2017, p37 - Gerry Harvey, chief executive of the FICC Markets Standards Board (FMSB).''
A pensions funding method is considered stable if it is not greatly affected by fluctuations in experience.




3.


==See also==
''Bank funding.''
* [[Conduct risk]]
 
* [[FMSB]]
Sources of bank funding are considered stable if they can be depended on to remain as part of the bank's funding, including under conditions of stress.
* [[Front-running]]
 
* [[Layering]]
For example, deposits by retail customers within the size limits of relevant deposit guarantee schemes are considered relatively more stable, compared with larger and professionally managed deposits.
* [[Ramping]]
 
* [[Spoofing]]
 
* [[Wash trading]]
== See also ==
* [[Deposit]]
* [[Deposit Guarantee Scheme]]
* [[Experience]]
* [[Flighty]]
* [[Funding]]
* [[High Council for Financial Stability]]
* [[Leverage]]
* [[Maturity transformation]]
* [[Operational balances]]
* [[Retail]]
* [[Run]]
* [[Run rate]]
* [[Sticky]]
* [[Stress]]
* [[Term out]]
* [[Volatility]]

Revision as of 17:01, 2 August 2018

1.

The desirable qualities of predictability and confidence about future market conditions.


2.

Pensions funding.

A pensions funding method is considered stable if it is not greatly affected by fluctuations in experience.


3.

Bank funding.

Sources of bank funding are considered stable if they can be depended on to remain as part of the bank's funding, including under conditions of stress.

For example, deposits by retail customers within the size limits of relevant deposit guarantee schemes are considered relatively more stable, compared with larger and professionally managed deposits.


See also

Retrieved from ‘https://wiki.treasurers.org/w/index.php?title=Squeeze&oldid=44923’