Transaction cost analysis: Difference between revisions

From ACT Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>Doug Williamson
(Create page - source - The Treasurer online - https://www.treasurers.org/hub/treasurer-magazine/how-treasurers-can-manage-fx-risk-optimise-tech)
 
imported>Doug Williamson
(Add link.)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 25: Line 25:
*[[Account analysis]]
*[[Account analysis]]
*[[Best execution]]
*[[Best execution]]
*[[CFO]]
*[[Corporate]]
*[[Corporate]]
*[[Counterparty]]
*[[Counterparty]]
Line 31: Line 32:
*[[Foreign exchange]]  (FX)
*[[Foreign exchange]]  (FX)
*[[Transaction]]
*[[Transaction]]
* [[Transparent]]


[[Category:Accounting,_tax_and_regulation]]
[[Category:Accounting,_tax_and_regulation]]

Latest revision as of 08:23, 31 August 2022

(TCA).

An analysis for a customer of their costs over a given time period.


Delivering FX cost promises
"FX best execution offers many benefits to treasurers; most importantly cost reduction.
However, pursuing FX best execution can be extremely difficult for corporate treasurers, as it requires them to implement and manage multiple FX counterparty relationships simultaneously...


Corporates should seek out solutions that also incorporate transaction cost analysis (TCA).
TCA provides corporates with a transparent breakdown of FX costs across all their transactions as proof that a pre-agreed cost promise has been delivered.
TCA can also be shared with the CFO, board of directors or shareholders, as evidence of best practice."


Multibank FX platforms and fintech FX solutions - Eric Huttman, CEO of MillTechFX - The Treasurer online, October 2021


See also