Transaction cost analysis: Difference between revisions
From ACT Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>Doug Williamson (Create page - source - The Treasurer online - https://www.treasurers.org/hub/treasurer-magazine/how-treasurers-can-manage-fx-risk-optimise-tech) |
imported>Doug Williamson (Add link.) |
||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
*[[Account analysis]] | *[[Account analysis]] | ||
*[[Best execution]] | *[[Best execution]] | ||
*[[CFO]] | |||
*[[Corporate]] | *[[Corporate]] | ||
*[[Counterparty]] | *[[Counterparty]] |
Revision as of 20:55, 1 November 2021
(TCA).
An analysis for a customer of their costs over a given time period.
- Delivering FX cost promises
- "FX best execution offers many benefits to treasurers; most importantly cost reduction.
- However, pursuing FX best execution can be extremely difficult for corporate treasurers, as it requires them to implement and manage multiple FX counterparty relationships simultaneously...
- Corporates should seek out solutions that also incorporate transaction cost analysis (TCA).
- TCA provides corporates with a transparent breakdown of FX costs across all their transactions as proof that a pre-agreed cost promise has been delivered.
- TCA can also be shared with the CFO, board of directors or shareholders, as evidence of best practice."
- Multibank FX platforms and fintech FX solutions - Eric Huttman, CEO of MillTechFX - The Treasurer online, October 2021